GBM 4: Vorlesung Versuchsplanung - Sommersemester 2013
Zeit und Ort
Material
Literatur
Ethik
Diskussion zu versuchsplanerischen Aspekten
Wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten
Jüngere Fälle von wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten
Zeit und Ort | top
Di 14-16h
OS62 R 10 (IPN-HS)
Klausur: Di 09.07.11 10:15-11:45 (HS Leibniz-Straße 1 - Klaus-Murmann-Hörsaal)
Material | top
Folien Versuchsplanung (pdf, 15.05.13)
Folien Ethik (pdf, 09.04.13)
Literatur | top
- Carrier, M. 2006. Wissenschaftstheorie. Hamburg: Junius.
- Feynman, R: Cargo cult science
- Huber, O. 2009. Das psychologische Experiment: Eine Einführung (5. Aufl.). Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
- Kirk, R. E.: Foundations of Research Issues (pdf): Versuchspläne erläutert
- Schwarz, N. 1996. Cognition and Communication: Judgmental Biases, Research Methods, and the Logic of Conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Stanovich, K. 2009. How To Think Straight About Psychology (9th ed.). Pearson.
Ethik | top
- Ethik-Kommission der DGPs
- Auszug forschungsrelevanter ethischer Richtlinien der DGPs (pdf)
- Ethische Richtlinien der DGPs und des BDP
- Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct der APA
- Helsinki-Deklaration zum Umgang mit Versuchspersonen
- Psychologie und Folter (pdf, Prof. Mausfeld)
- Wissenschaftler profilieren sich als Folterknechte (Zeit Online, 7/2009, Prof. Mausfeld)
- Warum der Utilitarismus die Freiheit der Forschung bedroht (Spiegel Online, 10/2012)
Diskussion zu versuchsplanerischen Aspekten | top
Publication Bias, das Problem fehlender Replikationen und wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten
- Health Care's Trick Coin (New York Times, 2/1013)
- Perspectives on Psychological Science - Special Issue on Replicability: A Crisis of Confidence? (11/2012)
- Nobel laureate challenges psychologists to clean up their act (nature, 10/2012)
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (PNAS, 9/2012)
- Replication is the only solution to scientific fraud (the guardian, 9/2012)
- The drugs don't work: a modern medical scandal (the guardian, 9/2012)
- False positives: fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific research (the guardian, 9/2012)
- Open Science Framework: Reproducibility Project - replicating key psychology studies
- The time is right to confront misconduct (nature, 08/2012)
- Good Scientist! You Get a Badge. (slate, 8/2012)
- Independent labs to verify high-profile papers (nature, 8/2012)
- Research: Uncovering misconduct (nature, 5/2012)
- Replication - psychology's house of cards? (The Psychologist, 5/2012)
- Psychology Replication studies: Bad copy (nature, 5/2012)
- Beware the creeping cracks of bias (nature, 5/2012)
- Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (Psychological Science, 5/2012)
- Psychology initiative investigates field's reproducibility (Science 3/2012, nicht frei zugänglich)
- Majority of landmark cancer studies cannot be replicated (nature, 3/2012, nicht frei zugänglich), (Reuters, frei zugänglich)
- External Validity of Research in the Psychological Laboratory (Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3/2012)
- Psychology’s Woes and a Partial Cure: The Value of Replication (Psychological Observer, 2/2012)
- Forscher zweifeln an Wirksamkeit von Tamiflu (Spiegel Online, 01/2012)
- False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant (Psychological Science, 11/2011)
- Science publishing: Rise of the retractions (nature, 10/2011)
- Pressure for Positive Results Puts Science Under Threat, Study Shows (Science Daily, 9/2011)
- How much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9/2011)
- Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results (PLoS one, 6/2011)
- How drug companies' PR tactics skew the presentation of medical research (the guardian, 5/2011)
- Unpublished results hide the decline effect (nature, 2/2011)
- Replication problems and reproducible research (Statistics, Politics, and Policy, 2/2011)
- Decline Effect: The Truth Wears Off - Is there something wrong with the scientific method? (The NewYorker, 12/2010)
- Sins against science: Scientific misconduct may be more prevalent than you think (APA monitor, 7/2010)
- "Positive" Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (PLoS one, 4/2010)
- Accessible reproducible research (Science, 1/2010)
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? (PLoS one, 5/2009)
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (Epidemiology, 9/2008, Errata)
- Missing in action: the trials that did not make the news (the guardian, 08/2008)
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science (PLoS Medicine, 07/2008)
- Repairing research integrity (nature, 1/2008)
- Most Science Studies Appear to Be Tainted By Sloppy Analysis (Wall Street Journal, 9/2007)
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (PLoS Medicine, 8/2005, Kritik, Antwort)
- Scientists behaving badly (nature, 6/2005, nicht frei zugänglich)
- Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (Journal of the American Medical Association JAMA, 02/2005)
Selektivität von Versuchspersonen und Versuchstieren
- We agree it's WEIRD, but is it WEIRD enough? (Neuroanthropology Blog, 7/2010)
- Mice Fall Short as Test Subjects for Humans' Deadly Ills (New York Times, 2/2013)
- The Mouse Trap: How one rodent rules the lab (Slate, 11/2011)
- Schöner wohnen für Labortiere (Zeit Online, 11/2009)
- Anregendere Umgebung für Labortiere (Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 11/2006)
Wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten | top
Formale Richtlinien zur guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis
- Office of Research Integrity: Research Misconduct
- Academic Misconduct (University of Sussex)
- Vorschläge zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis (pdf, DFG-Kommission "Selbstkontrolle in der Wissenschaft", 1/2009)
Plagiarismus und Autorenschaft
- Portal Plagiat (HTW Berlin)
- Interview: Das Wissenschaftsplagiat (Spiegel Online, 6/2010)
- Unethische Autorenschaften in den Wissenschaften (Telepolis, 3/2006)
- Copy & Paste-Epidemie an Schulen und Universitäten (Telepolis, 3/2006)
- Textueller Missbrauch - Copy/Paste-Paradigma Teil I (Telepolis, 11/2006)
- Die abschreibende Zunft - Copy/Paste-Paradigma Teil II (Telepolis, 12/2006)
- Wissenschaft als Web-Sampling – Copy/Paste-Paradigma Teil III (Telepolis, 12/2006)
- Contentklau in Blogs und anderswo – Copy/Paste-Paradigma Teil IV (Telepolis, 3/2007)
- Reuse, Remix, Mashup – also: Plagiieren erlaubt! – Copy/Paste-Paradigma Teil V (Telepolis, 3/2007)
Jüngere Fälle von wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten | top
Aktuelle Fälle allgemein
Psychologie
- Lawrence Sanna: Uncertainty shrouds psychologist's resignation (nature, 7/2012)
- Dirk Smeesters: Rotterdam Marketing Psychologist Resigns After University Investigates His Data (ScienceInsider, 6/2012)
- Dirk Smeesters: Why a new case of misconduct in psychology heralds interesting times for the field (Discovery Magazine, 6/2012)
- Diederik Stapel: The Mind of a Con Man (New York Times, 05/2013)
- Diederik Stapel: Final report of the Tilburg University investigation commitee (pdf, insbesondere Abschnitt 5, 12/2012)
- Diederik Stapel: Renommierter Psychologe gesteht Fälschungen (Spiegel Online, 11/2011)
- Diederik Stapel: Massive Fraud Uncovered in Work by Social Psychologist (Scientific American, 11/2011)
- Diederik Stapel: Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case (nature 11/2011)
- Marc Hauser: Marc Hauser admits to errors as US government finds misconduct (nature 9/2012)
- Marc Hauser: Marc Hauser resigns from Harvard (Wired, 8/2011)
- Marc Hauser: Fehlender Zweifel (Zeit Online, 4/2011)
- Karen Ruggiero: Findings of scientific misconduct (NIH notice, 12/2001)
- Karen Ruggiero: The ongoing legacy of a case of scientific misconduct (The Hardest Science blog, 1/2011)
